Humanist.com

2 2

Never in their 175 year history has Scientific American endorsed a presidential candidate ... until now!

[scientificamerican.com]

p-nullifidian 7 Sep 16
Share

Post a comment Author often replies/likes Reply Author often replies/likes Add Photo

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

We've never had a fascist cult leader in the White House before!

2

How many of those who regularly read this magazine are tempted to vote for Trump ?

Not knowing the demographics, I cannot say, although it seems to me that the majority of Trump's core are not inclined to subscribe to scientific periodicals. That said, for a journal devoted to what should be a nonpartisan topic, to break with 175 years of impartiality is significant.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:534592
Humanist does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.